New water project worries rural dwellers

By The Reporter

Residents of Ha Joele, Ribaneng in Mafeteng district are fearful that the impending implementation of the Lesotho-Botswana Water Transfer Scheme will plunge them into the doom of losing their valuable properties. This emerged during the launch of Seinoli Legal Centre’s new website and the screening of two films depicting the voices of the residents and how they might be impacted by the giant transnational project.

The films showcase the impact of water infrastructure projects on host communities in the country, with Ribaneng community being one of them. Lesotho-Botswana Water Project compromises the construction of a dam and water storage reservoir in the Lesotho lowlands. The objective of the project is to undertake a full feasibility study for the bulk water conveyance system from the proposed dam on the Makhaleng River to transfer water to Botswana through South Africa, covering the technical, economic, and financial feasibility of the project. A chunk of villagers who will be affected lives in the area located between Makhaleng and Ribaneng rivers.

The Orange-Senqu Commission (ORASECOM) signed a Memorandum of Understanding in March 2013 to facilitate the implementation of executing feasibility studies on the project. An amount of US$2.68 million (slightly over
M45 million) was sourced from the African Development Bank (AFDB) through ORASECOM. According to documentation by the AFDB, the feasibility studies began in April 2021 with an expected completion date of June 2023.


Commenting on concerns raised by the Makhaleng community in the film, a consultant and senior lecturer in development studies at the National University of Lesotho (NUL) Setšabi Setšabi observed that public participation plays a vital role in issues that affect the community. As a result, he added, such participation should be taken into consideration before the commencement of the project as required by international law.

He said the film by Seinoli highlighted the theme of public participation and the anxiety of the people who are to be affected by the project. It also showed how through the grapevine the communities heard that they may be relocated. “These two things highlighted a major gap in access to information about the proposed dam. “Imagine after working so hard being told by the grapevines that your house will be relocated and your ways of living might change. That simply shows how anxious the community is over the project,” Setšabi added.

Further, he noted that Ribaneng community has its own way of life and culture which include farming, rearing livestock, and access to resources such as water and wood. “As a result, changing the way they live is going to be difficult for them especially if they do not have enough information on how the matter will be undertaken,” he warned. Setšabi said the document called The Basic Principles and Guidelines on Development-based Evictions and Displacement (2018) outlines the major public participation activities before, during, and after evictions.

He explained that before evictions the following activities should take place: appropriate notice, information
dissemination to affected communities, and dialogue with affected communities. Additionally, sensitization on human rights, participation in environmental, social, and human rights impact assessments as well as assessments of all personal assets should also be taken into consideration.

“During evictions all human rights standards must be observed, especially the rights of women, children, people with disabilities, and the elderly,” he observed. Setšabi added that after evictions, governments must ensure that the shelter – housing, food, water and sanitation, medical services, livelihood resources, education for children as well as standards of living are observed. Setšabi urged that the community should benefit from their own developments that are through access to jobs, greater food security, and access to potable water and water for their livestock.

The community also has rights to improved access to sustainable energy, improved road infrastructure, access to rangelands as well as access to fishing in the dam. For his part, legal practitioner Advocate Borenahabokhethe Sekonyela emphasised that public participation is one of the fundamental human rights for the communities to be part of decision-making in matters that affect their livelihoods. He said the legal right to access information is
also critical for the affected people adding that “people perish for lack of knowledge.” He noted: “Full information is required on the standard of living of the people in terms of health, socio-economic status, and others have to be fully documented before the commencement of the project,” He said the community has to benefit through compensation fund after losing their properties, especially land.

“Compensation should also be done because land is permanently taken from communities while compensation is only temporary for a 50-year period. “Future generations of the communities will never enjoy any benefit from the land which the forefathers had,” Sekonyela stressed. Seinoli is a public interest law centre that provides free legal services and support to communities which get affected by the implementation of large infrastructure development projects in the country. The center’s unique approach leverages strategic litigation, advocacy, and capacity strengthening of communities to empower such communities to demand and assert their rights.

In Southern Africa and specifically in Lesotho, the displacement of rural communities from their land, with little or no compensation, represents one of the negative impacts of land-based investments such as the construction of dams. It results in the displacement of rural communities from the land they depend on for growing food, building shelters, fetching water, grazing their animals, and accessing land-based resources.

The launch of the website was said to be a great milestone that will enable Seinoli to share its work with affected communities, members of the public, and other important stakeholders locally, regionally, and internationally. It will also enable the law NGO to receive feedback and learn how best to support the communities and improve services. The website is www.seinoli.org.ls

Read More

Potential impacts of the Lesotho-Botswana Water Transfer Scheme.

The Lesotho-Botswana Water Transfer (L-BWTS) Scheme is being conducted in terms of a Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) signed in 2017 between the governments of Lesotho, Botswana, and South Africa. In terms of this agreement, a dam will be constructed along the Makhaleng river in the southern lowlands of Lesotho. The project shall supply Botswana with water through a conveyance water pipeline going through South Africa. It will further provide the three countries with electricity to complement the system power needs of the local towns in the countries.
Seinoli Legal Centre (SLC), a public interest law centre that protects the rights of communities affected by the construction of dams and large infrastructure in Lesotho, has consulted the 21 would-be-affected communities to determine their awareness of the L-BWT project and the impact thereof. No official information or communication has been made to the communities regarding the project which indicates that the principle of Free Prior Informed Consent (FPIC) has not been applied to communities to be affected by the project. The standards of living and livelihoods of communities living along the river will be greatly affected, as they will be forced to resettle to make way for the dam and their land and natural resources will be lost to the dam. These communities have a right to be informed and consulted about decisions which affect their lives.
The SLC calls on the project authorities, in particular ORASECOM which is the executing body to ensure that members of communities to be affected are put at the center of this project and that their rights and interests are respected.
Read More

Botswana set to draw water from Lesotho: Is Lesotho ready to venture into another water development?

Lesotho has approved to venture into a water scheme with Botswana and South Africa. The $2.3 million Mega dam project funded by the African Development Bank (ADB) was agreed on by the three countries in 2013. Makhaleng river has been identified as a suitable site for the construction of the dam and the proposed project is currently at its feasibility study phase. A Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) and a Memorandum of Agreement (MoA) were signed by the concerned parties to undertake the feasibility studies for the Lesotho-Botswana Water Transfer Scheme, however, none of the host communities identified to be directly affected by this dam have any information pertaining to this project nor activities underpinning the feasibility.
The below article illustrates the potential impact the water scheme poses if proper procedures are not followed by the implementing authorities.
Read More

A different dimension of the food security issue

A different dimension of the food security issue is addressed by the story of Malehloa Sefao of Ha Rafanyane. Sefao narrated that compensation was calculated and delivered by the LHDA, ultimately cheated them as affected households. The bags of maize that they were offered by LHDA at the beginning of the construction of the dam were far bigger than what they are now being offered. The size of the bag of food supplies they were given has reduced. The bags are far smaller than they used to as illustrated in the picture below. The villagers were first given 50kg bag of maize and now it has been reduced to 25 kg.

Sefao then further noted that three women from the village by the names of Mateboho Motsamai, Mathabiso Mohobane and Manyatso Seafo used to run a gardening project but their garden was swallowed by the dam. These women supplied freshly grown vegetables from their garden which villagers now have to travel longer distance to purchase.

Read More

Untold stories of the Katse dam

From a distance, the Katse dam is a spectacle of engineering. It has been constructed to the highest engineering standards in the world and various parts of the project have won international recognised awards.

The dam has nonetheless caused untold suffering amongst the 20, 000 people whose livelihoods have been affected by construction of the dam.
The communities living around the Katse dam have suffered numerous setbacks as a result of the dam. One of the most critical setbacks has been the decline in food security as their arable lands were inundated. LHDA put in place a compensation plan for the lost fields but the compensation has fallen far short of the expectations of local communities as they say they are receiving paltry payments which have condemned the villagers to poverty and starvation.

Read More

Community slams police over brutality

The Reporter

Communities along the newly constructed Ha Seshote-Polihali Dam road which connects Leribe to Mokhotlong want the construction of the road to be halted immediately after their protest turned into a police atrocity. When the Lesotho Highland Development Authority (LHDA) 2019 started construction of the Phase II road from Ha-Seshote to Polihali Dam, the communities were excited at the prospective benefits of the road. However, they are now disappointed after police officers brutally assaulted them on May 10, 2022.

Community members report that members of the Ha-Lejone police and the Lesotho Defence Force mercilessly annihilated the community members when they staged a protest for compensation for their assets and against a power outage that had lasted three weeks. About 40 men and women, some of them very old, and the chief of the village were tortured by being made to perform degrading and physically daunting exercises like squats and rolling on a gravel road, while they were also immersing them in the river. The security agents also hurled profanities while thrashing their victims.

In an interview this week, one of the victims 70-year-old ‘Matsotang Selialia said her body was still sore and she could not exert herself in any way. “I cannot begin to describe the pain I am experiencing; my knees cannot carry me anymore. Given my age, what those people did to me was as disrespectful as it was dehumanizing. What makes it even more disturbing is that it was carried out by people we are supposed to trust,” Selialia said angrily.

She asked for compensation funds to seek medication. She also suggested that the wayward police officers and soldiers be suspended with immediate effect. Another victim ‘Marethabile Maieane (38), said she struggles to relieve herself due to injuries she sustained to her buttocks and other parts. She worries about losing her job at a local restaurant; she has not been able to report herself at work due to her condition.

The chief of Liseleng, Kose Sekonyela, said the protests were triggered by blasting activities done by a company identified as HSPY Joint Venture in April. “Without engaging the community, the owners of HSPY, Dion Mapinde, and Mark, unilaterally appointed Community Liaison Officer (CLO) who is proving to be very ignorant.

“We used to be warned beforehand when the blasting activity was about to take place. However, it came as a surprise when we explosions from the rocks in our area. The blasting destroyed people’s houses and affected our livestock. It also caused a power outage which disrupted people’s lives. “I tried to approach the CLO who promised to promptly attend to the matter. But the activity did not stop hence the community decided to take matters into our hands,” he said.

Sekonyela insisted his people were well within their rights as they wanted to be heard. He was particularly incensed that, instead of hearing the people out, HSPY decided to call in armed policemen and soldiers to do its dirty work. “I am not happy with the incident, even though those police officers later came to apologise to the community on Sunday. It is wrong to torture people when they fight for their rights,” he concluded. Human rights lawyer Borenahabokhethe Sekonyela stated categorically that the community’s rights had been blatantly violated, and reiterated that everyone has a right to life and to liberty, as well as freedom from slavery, torture, discrimination
and a fair trial.

“As a lawyer, I regard what the police officers and soldiers did as illegal. I totally condemn what they did, especially to the chief and the women who I have heard were being kicked around and forced to on the ground without considering their privacy as females,” Sekonyela said. Sekonyela poured scorn on claims that the community
members were in breach of the Penal Code and disturbing the peace. He has instituted legal proceedings on behalf of the community, against the security agencies. The matter will be heard by the Thaba Tseka magistrate’s court on Monday.

Meanwhile, Seinoli Legal Centre’s liaison officer Mothusi Seqhea condemned the heavy-handedness of the police and reiterated that such assault and torture were a glaring violation of the victim’s rights. “As Seinoli Legal Centre it is our mandate to assist the communities that are affected by large development projects. Therefore, we are going to provide legal assistance to the Liseleng community to ensure they get justice,” Seqhea said. In another development, LHDA public relations manager Gerald Mokone urged the Liseleng community to allow the road construction process to proceed while LHDA addresses its concerns. He also promised that the blasting activity will be done the right way.

Survivors of Lesotho Dams (SOLD) chairperson Lenka Thamae says the organization is going to report Lesotho Mounted Police Services to the Commonwealth Secretariat after policers officers brutally assaulted protestors at Liseleng in Thaba-Tseka. Addressing a press conference in Maseru this week, Thamae pleaded with the minister of water to go and apologies to the Liseleng community which was assaulted and degraded on May 10, 2022. He said the community was protesting the Lesotho Highlands Water Project for compensation for their properties that have been affected during the construction of the road that leads to Polihali Dam.

“SOLD cannot condone this behaviour that was displayed by the Lesotho police officers by abusing people when they fight for their rights. There are documentaries and studies that show that Lesotho police officers are dirty.
“We want the police to also go and apologise to those people; we demand that people who were injured in the fracas be taken for medical attention and compensated. “We have also heard reports of police molesting community members over their fields and assets that have been affected by the construction of the road that leads to Polihali,” Thamae said.

Read More

The impacts of the construction of Katse Dam

Mamonake Monaheng and Makeketso Kuoane from the village of Rapooea in Katse say one of the major challenges they face as women affected by large developments is collecting firewood. This crucial resource which was inundated by the Katse dam has become scarce, forcing women to travel long hours to get firewood from the village streams.

The twigs consisting of Senokonoko, moluoane and lengala is the least they can get from the streams to use in their homes for cooking, warming up and lighting. Important things like fruit trees, wild vegetables and medicinal plants, which cured different illnesses have been lost to the dam.

Read More

The village of Mapeleng and the seismic shift:

The village of Mapeleng was affected by the seismic shift in 1995 during the inundation of the Katse dam. As a result of the seismic shift the natural springs dried up and this village lacked access to clean drinking water for 16years. Seinoli Legal Centre assisted this community to lodge a case before the High Court of Lesotho in 2011 to claim restoration of clean water supply for the community.

This community won the battle against Lesotho Highlands Development Authority (LHDA). Today Mapeleng community has access to clean drinking water and this has helped alleviate the community from water borne diseases and the struggle of walking long distances to access to clean water.
Despite this victory, this community is still facing many challenges in relation to non- payment of compensation of its grazing land, natural resources and arable land that were affected some 26 years back when Lesotho Highlands Water Project (LHWP) was implemented.

LHDA’s non-compliance with its obligations in terms of the 1986 Treaty, the Lesotho 1993 Constitution and the 1986 LHDA Order, has continued to create a huge justice gap which has left the affected communities without access to their basic human rights.

Read More

Fisherman’s tale: The fishing curse

Ha Lejone is one of many communities which had to sacrifice their land for Lesotho Highlands Water Project (LHWP). Katse dam is Africa’s first largest water project which was constructed in 1989 for the purposes of supplying water to the Republic of South Africa and generating hydropower for Lesotho.

The LHWP has stimulated lucrative commercial fish farming deals and projects like Highlands Trout, which undertakes large scale trout production in Katse dam. It has been exporting fish caught in the katse dam to Japan and South Africa over the years.

It is a different reality for local fishermen who claim they have not been benefiting from the dam. The fishermen explain that fishing has become a nightmare for locals.

Two fishermen from Ha Lejone Tumelo Ratjofa and Namane Namane say local fishermen are only allowed to catch fish from the dam if they have fishing licenses which cost M100.00; if they do not have licences, they get arrested and their fishing equipment gets confiscated.

Both fishermen said they have been victims of harassment for catching fish in the dam. Mr Ratjofa has been arrested together with his wife and Mr Namane was shot at.

Namane and Ratjofa believe that their community should be free to fish at any time and not be limited to how many fish to catch; after all, they were told by the LHDA that they were beneficiaries of this project.

Seinoli believes that LHWP should ensure fair distribution of benefits and guarantee better livelihoods for affected communities by improving the economic condition of local fishermen.

Read More

VICTIMS OF DEVELOPMENTS

Developments like dam constructions should bring better prospects of life for host communities, however this is not the case for the Katse communities whose lives have been eroded by the construction of the Katse dam. The dam was constructed in 1989 as a binational project between Lesotho and South Africa which was administered by the Lesotho Highlands Development Authority (LHDA) in the highlands of Lesotho which is predominantly rural in character and where poverty is inevitable and intense.

Prior to the implementation, 88 villages that were settled in the area were hopeful that this project would help them attain better and improved living standards as they were promised jobs and compensation in the form of cash for assets that would be affected and ancillary developments in their community and a resettlement programme for people whose houses would have to be relocated, all of which the project authority never met.

Instead, this community which depended on subsistence agriculture as the main source of livelihood incurred a loss of arable, grazing land, houses, graves, forests, medicinal plants and other indigenous plants, cultural roots and control of their natural resources to the project.

The existence of the Katse dam has shown more dissatisfaction by the community. The community says before the dam everything was plentiful, firewood, fertile river banks, cropland, good pastures and peace of mind but now they endure hard lives. “Today is different, we are poorer than before because many promises were made by the project authority but never met and this has resulted to the communities being seriously poverty- stricken”. Malibuseng Bosiu says in an interview.

The existence of the Katse dam has resulted to involuntary resettlement, loss of land for food and livestock production, loss of housing and related property, loss of social and physical infrastructure, loss of bio-diversity promotion of seismic activity and changes in the environment, the loss of social morality and social networks all of which have disrupted the lives and livelihoods of the dam impacted communities and subject them to risks and high vulnerability for sustainable livelihoods. The dam impacted areas had also retained a high scourge of STDs and HIV/AIDS during and after the dam construction phases which were brought about by dam operations and immigrant workers.

During Phase 1A of the Katse dam, about 1 900 hectares of arable land was lost, which also affected about 2, 345 households. Further loss of land of about 1, 000 hectares of arable land was added which affected 1 000 households. The lost grazing land as a result of Katse, ‘Muela, and Mohale was 5 000 hectares jointly. Other losses during Phase 1A were 3 000 trees and 17 hectares of garden land. The community also lost about 3, 000 trees, and 17 hectares of garden land. Maize and pulses were mainly given out as compensation for lost arable land during Phase 1A, while cash could be considered during Phase 1B.

Villagers from Ha Kostable claim they lost their trees and reed to the dam and were promised compensation but that was never fulfilled. The resettlement programme was a failure as far as reconstruction of the livelihoods of the resettled communities and households were concerned.
The plight of the community goes beyond material necessities, extending to “lost family ties”, the dam has separated many communities that once closely interacted with one another through physical, social and economic linkages that connected them.

The communities relayed highly on fishery, the fish they caught they ate in their own households and some they would sell locally in small batches but now fishing has become restricted by LHDA. They are required to apply for fishing permits which only enables them to catch only two fish per day per person and that they also be of specified size (fish should be the size of a ruler). Without the fishing permits they are arrested and their fish catches are confiscated. This they saw as a grave injustice where fish that they had always had free access to for generations were now inaccessible to them whilst the fishing companies could draw the fish from the dam in their droves.

The villagers lamented that LHDA has also forsaken them by reneging on its promises made in 1987 when the construction of the Katse dam started. The disgruntled villagers want compensation for their fields and houses that were cover by the dam. The few “lucky” ones who have received payments are also very unhappy about the paltry amount. They were also promised ancillary developments like roads, electricity and Health facilities, improvement of schools but that has not been fulfilled.

Read More